We’re a social bunch

Let's talk Business

Intervention to Tackle Vessel Oversupply Not Viable or Needed, Experts Agree

Posted 16.06.2017
Back to news

by Alisdair Pettigrew
Managing Director, BLUE Communications

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BFF6-MuIuaA

A panel of shipping industry experts, including leading economist Martin Stopford, has disputed conclusions made by industry leaders at Danish Maritime Days (DMD) 2016, arguing there was no need for either market based or regulatory intervention to break a period of sustained low freight rates, erosion of asset value and vessel oversupply.

The panel, speaking at a debate co-hosted by international law firm Norton Rose Fulbright and leading marine and energy PR and communications consultancy BLUE, also disputed conclusions at DMD 2016 that the market may never recover.  However, it did warn that if the current downward cycle reached 2021 it would constitute the longest downturn that the industry has ever seen.

In 2016, the DMD group surmised that two general approaches could be taken to achieve a rapid reduction of the present cargo fleet capacity: a free market approach, where the book value of assets were realigned to reflect their real market value, and a more interventionist approach.

But, while admitting that there remained substantial oversupply in the market, the Norton Rose Fulbright/BLUE panel largely agreed that intervention in either incentivising the acceleration of scrapping, or in controlling newbuild numbers, was both impractical to implement and unnecessary.

Janina Lam, Head of dry bulk research at Howe Robinson, suggested that even if market intervention was feasible at the newbuild stage, shipbuilding was not an industry that reacted to market trends beyond commodity prices, commenting:

“Yards might be creating a false demand for newbuilds as they do not price according to the markets. For them it’s more about the tonnes of steel. Although the markets in tankers, bulkers, containers do not correlate with each other we see the newbuild prices correlating. And this is because the yards to do not care so much about the markets themselves, but more about their forward cover. This is where I see the problem that has led to a pro-cyclical ordering.”

In terms of incentivising scrapping, recycling expert and consultant and non-executive director for vessel cash buyer GMS, Dr Nikos Mikelis commented: “The market will sort itself out. I don’t see the need for governments to subsidise scrapping. I cannot see recycling intervention working. Ballast will get some ships, but it’s a moving feast [in terms of when].”

Martin Stopford, President of Clarksons, stated that if the oversupply issues were not resolved, then the downturn could extend for many years, citing that if market recovery did not commence before 2021, the industry would have been in the longest downward cycle dating back to the 19th Century.

More news

AI in PR: It can’t do what you want us to do
Posted 13.02.2024
BLUE has expanded its marine portfolio after winning new client, maritime insurance broker FDR
Posted 31.01.2024
Career Snapshots - Simon Haynes
Posted 03.01.2024

Let’s talk

Get in touch

Cookie consent

Please choose which cookies you want to consent to.